Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3373381

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

7 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

a two story rear extension.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for a two storey rear extension at [site address] , [site address] , Westmorland and Furness [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 2025/1086/HOU, subject to the conditions in the attached schedule.

  2. Section 03

    Main Issue

    The main issue is the impact of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host property, including whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the [site address] Conservation Area (GSCA).

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    [site address] is part of the GSCA the significance of which is derived in part through its historical importance as a stop on a former drover’s route and the well preserved examples of vernacular architecture; which utilise traditional materials and are centred on the settlements historic core. The appeal site is identified as being within area C within the [site address] Conservation Area Character Appraisal and Management Plan 2020 (GSCAMP) which covers the southern end of the village and includes dwellings that date from the 19th and 20th century, resulting in a mix of both contemporary and simple vernacular architecture. The GSCAMP identifies a mix of external finishes in this area including local sandstone and roughcast render, with UPVC being the predominant style of window.

    The appeal property is a simple two storey detached dwelling with outbuildings to the rear. It is constructed from traditional materials, including local sandstone, and is an attractive example of simple rural vernacular architecture. In light of this the host property makes a positive contribution to the significance of the GSCA. The appeal property is flanked by both traditional and contemporary dwellings, the building line of which are staggered, with generous gaps in places. This allows a view of the side elevations of [site address] from public vantage points. However, these views are restricted when entering the village from the south by a strip of mature woodland and when approaching the dwelling from the north by [address] which is on the same side of the street as the appeal property, but closer to the road.

    The proposal is for the removal of the single storey outbuildings on the rear elevation and the erection of a two storey rear extension. The extension would project several meters from the rear elevation, would be lower than the ridge height of the main building and set in from its side elevations. A small number of openings are proposed on the side elevation, the design of which reflect the simple detailing of the host property. On the rear elevation, feature full height glazing is proposed.

    The projection of the proposed extension would be significant. However, due to its height and width it would not appear overly dominant in comparison to the host property which is large and positioned within a generous plot. Further, the proposed external materials would include local sandstone and slate which would match and be sympathetic to [site address] and act to minimise the visual impact of the extension. While it is acknowledged that the sides of the extension would be visible from the public realm a combination of existing development, mature trees and shrubs act to screen these views ensuring that they are localised and largely limited to glimpses when passing the property on the B6412. The rear elevation faces agricultural land and would not be clearly visible from the public realm. In light of these factors, the appeal scheme would preserve the character and appearance of the GSCA.

    In conclusion I find that the proposed development would respect the character and appearance of the host property to the extent that it would preserve the character and appearance of the GSCA. Hence, there would be no conflict with s72(1) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 and Policies ENV10 and DEV 5 of the Eden Local Plan 2014-2032 which requires the new development shows a clear understanding of the form and character of the districts built and natural environment and conserves and where appropriate enhances the significance of Eden’s heritage assets. There would also be respect for the National Planning Policy Framework insofar as it relates to achieving well-designed places and conserving and enhancing the historic environment.

  4. Section 05

    Conditions

    I have considered the conditions put forward by the Council and the appellant’s comments on them. They meet the tests set out at paragraph 57 of the Framework, and I have included them with some minor editing of the suggested wording for precision and enforceability. A condition regarding proposed external materials has also been attached to protect the character and appearance of the GSCA.

    The Council recommended a condition to remove permitted development rights for the formation of any additional side windows at first floor level, to protect the privacy of neighbouring occupants. However, the conditions specified in paragraph A.3 in Part 1 Schedule 2 of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015 states that any upper floor windows formed as permitted development must be obscure-glazed and in some circumstances non-opening, which would be sufficient to preserve the privacy of neighbouring occupants.

  5. Section 06

    Conclusion

    For the reasons given above the appeal should be allowed.

  6. Section 07

    Schedule of Conditions

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with drawing Nos 25-194-DWG001 [name], 25-194-DWG002 [name], 25-194-DWG003 [name].

    No development above ground level shall take place until details of the materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the extension hereby permitted have been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details.

    The extension hereby permitted shall not be occupied until the first floor windows on the side elevation have been fitted with obscured glazing, and no part of those windows that is less than 1.7 metres above the floor of the room in which it is installed shall be capable of being opened. Details of the type of obscured glazing shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority before the window is installed and once installed the obscured glazing shall be retained thereafter. ***** END OF CONDITIONS*****

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 33807No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    3 December 2025Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    11 November 2025 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3373381
Application reference
2025/1086/HOU
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Eden District Council *
Planning authority code
E07000030

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Unknown
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
Not recorded
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
21 September 2025
Valid date
1 October 2025
Start date
1 October 2025
Planning authority decision date
8 September 2025
Appeal decision date
3 December 2025

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
80785
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:29
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21