Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3374320

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

4 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

conversion of garage to habitable room; replacement garage doors in front elevation; single- and two-storey side to rear extension; rear dormers; Juliette balcony to first floor rear elevation; external alterations; 1.2m timber gate to front; and alterations to the front hardstanding and rear patio.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for conversion of garage to habitable room; replacement garage doors in front elevation; single- and two-storey side to rear extension; rear dormers; Juliette balcony to first floor rear elevation; external alterations; 1.2m timber gate to front; and alterations to the front hardstanding and rear patio at [site address] , in accordance with the terms of the application, [name]/1867/25, and subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision.

    The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with approved plans Refs 114/P2/1 to 3 inclusive, dated 11 July 2025.

    [name] 3 of this permission, no development shall take place until details of soft landscaping to the forecourt of Brakelond have been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority, including a programme of implementation and maintenance; and the development shall be carried out and the soft landscaping maintained in accordance with the details and programme approved.

  2. Section 03

    Main Issue

    The written representations are made with reference to a previously refused application for a larger extension, but this appeal is considered strictly on a fresh appraisal of the individual merits of the present proposal.

    This is a many-faceted scheme wherein the Council objects only to the side and rear extension. Whilst noting concerns expressed by the Conservation Area Advisory Committee, I agree with the Council that the front garage conversion and timber gate would be acceptable and that the forecourt alterations could be made to avoid undue loss of soft landscaping by way of a planning condition.

    The main issue in this appeal is therefore the effect the proposed two-storey side and rear extension would have on the character and appearance of the dwelling house at Brakelond and on the surrounding [site address] Conservation Area (CA) and Area of Special Character, including the setting of the locally listed building at the adjacent property, Oakmead.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    Brakelond is specifically acknowledged in the Conservation Area Appraisal as making a positive contribution to the character and appearance of the [site address] CA.

    Brakelond has been extended in the past and has a partial crown roof at the rear, which would be significantly extended by the enlargement now proposed. A crown roof is a contrivance much used in the design of domestic additions to facilitate additional internal accommodation.

    [name] on higher ground to the west and the [address] School building opposite, Brakelond is not locally listed. I do not consider that the increase in the extent of the crown roof or the commensurate greater bulk or detailed design of the extension would alter the visual appearance or character of the existing house to an unacceptable degree.

    The extension would not be readily seen from the front and would not harm the street scene. Brakelond is relatively well separated from neighbouring Oakmead and also from Dunsmore immediately to the east. I do not consider that the increased extent of the crown roof would much alter the overall impression of the house in rear views.

    In summary, I find that the proposed development would avoid harm to the character and appearance of the [site address] CA, which would thus be preserved, as required by planning law. [name] do not consider that the larger extension would harm the setting of the locally listed Oakmead.

    Accordingly, the proposed development would comply with the aims of the adopted Harrow Council Core Strategy and Development Management Policies CS1 and DM1, 6 and 7. These are consistent with London Plan Policies HC1 and D3, and with national policy, in together seeking high-quality design to protect special local character and distinctiveness and preserve heritage assets.

    For the reasons explained, I conclude that this appeal should be allowed, subject to standard conditions and an additional requirement, as contemplated by the Council, for advance approval of details to ensure that appropriate soft landscaping is maintained within the forecourt of Brakelond, in the interest of preserving the character and appearance of the [site address] Conservation Area.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 1576No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    26 November 2025Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    14 November 2025 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3374320
Application reference
PL/1867/25
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
London Borough of Harrow
Planning authority code
E09000015

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Yes
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
7 October 2025
Valid date
7 October 2025
Start date
13 October 2025
Planning authority decision date
11 September 2025
Appeal decision date
26 November 2025

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
80459
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:29
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21