Skip to main content
Official casework recordDismissedCurrent release

Appeal 6000345

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

6 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

described as ‘Construction of an additional storey comprising 3 new flats on the front elevation of the detached block of flats. Provision of cycle and refuse storage.’

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is dismissed.

  2. Section 03

    Preliminary Matters

    The appeal is made pursuant to Schedule 2, Part 20, Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) (the GPDO). Class A permits development consisting of works for the construction of up to two additional storeys of new dwellinghouses immediately above the existing topmost residential storey on a building which is a purpose-built, detached block of flats, as well as certain associated works.

    This right is subject to limitations which are specified at paragraph A.1, and conditions which are set out at paragraph A.2. The conditions establish a requirement for developers to apply to the local planning authority for a determination as to whether prior approval will be required in relation to a number of specified prior approval matters.

  3. Section 04

    [name]

    The main issues are: • whether the proposal constitutes permitted development under Schedule 2, Part 20, Class A of the GPDO; and • if so, whether prior approval should be granted, having regard to the external appearance of the building.

  4. Section 05

    Permitted development

    Article 3 (9A) of the GPDO stipulates that Schedule 2 does not grant permission for, or authorise any development of, any new dwellinghouse where the nationally described space standards (NDSS) are not met.

    The main parties accept that one of the double bedrooms in the 2b4p flat measures less than 11.[address] metres and therefore fails to meet the requirements of the NDSS.

    The appellant puts forward that this could be addressed by a planning condition requiring further details to show compliance with the NDSS, and that the GPDO does not preclude the use of such a condition.

    However, the GPDO is clear that Schedule 2 does not permit any new dwellinghouse where the gross internal floorspace does not comply with the nationally described space standards, as is the case with the scheme before me. I also have insufficient evidence before me as to how the NDSS would be met in any event. Furthermore, conditioning amendments may disadvantage neighbouring properties who would not be consulted on the proposed amendments, if it results in a substantially different scheme.

    Consequently, I conclude that, as Article 3 (9A) of the GPDO would not be met, the proposal would not constitute permitted development in respect to Schedule 2, Part 20, Class A of the GPDO.

    As considerations in relation to prior approval are a follow-on condition stage under Class A.2(1), they apply only where a proposal constitutes permitted development. Given my conclusion above, there is no need to consider whether prior approval is required in this case.

  5. Section 06

    Conclusion

    For the reasons given above, I conclude that the appeal should be dismissed.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 4471No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    18 September 2025Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    3 September 2025 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
6000345
Application reference
24/4508/PNV
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
London Borough of Barnet
Planning authority code
E09000003

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appeal type reason
Not recorded
Appeal reason
refused
Type detail
Prior Approval
Jurisdiction
No Jurisdiction Associated
Link status
Not recorded

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
0 hectares
Floor space
3,000 m²
Number of residences
3
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Yes
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
No
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Dismissed
Decision category
Dismissed
Received date
18 June 2025
Valid date
18 June 2025
Start date
26 June 2025
Planning authority decision date
18 December 2024
Appeal decision date
18 September 2025

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
Not recorded
Bespoke
Not recorded
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
No
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Back Office-s78
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
76566
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:28
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Record updated
20 August 2026 at 16:28