Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 6000651

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

9 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

single storey front, side and rear extension with 2no roof lights.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for single storey front, side and rear extension with 2no roof lights at [site address] in accordance with the terms of the application, [name]/20729/001, and subject to the conditions set out in the attached schedule.

  2. Section 03

    Main Issue

    The main issue is the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of [address], with particular regard to visual impact and outlook.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    The appeal site comprises [site address] (No 10), a 2-storey semi-detached dwelling situated in a predominantly residential area. No 10 benefits from off-street parking to the front and a private garden to the rear.

    [address] (No 8) is a semi-detached dwelling situated on an adjacent plot to No 10. An accessway runs alongside the side of No 8 closest to No 10, which leads to a wide paved area to the rear of No 8. An outbuilding is situated on this paved area. Beyond the rear of the outbuilding is a garden, which stretches for some length towards the rear of No 8’s plot. I observed that the outlook from the paved area to the rear of No 8 is interrupted by the fence on the common boundary, by part of the side elevation of [address] (at a distance), and by trees situated further afield. Overall, despite the presence of these features, the outlook from the paved area is fairly clear and open.

    The proposed extension would extend beyond the rear wall of No 10 by approximately 6 metres, and would link to the proposed side extension element of the proposed development. However, it would be single-storey only with a flat roof and would be sited approximately 0.85 metres away from the boundary with No 8. As such, due to its maximum height and its distance from the common boundary, its visual impact would be limited when seen from the paved area. For the same reasons, the existing mostly open outlook from the paved area would be largely unaffected.

    The proposed extension would not extend past the existing outbuilding at No 8. When viewed from No 8’s rear garden, the proposed extension would be seen against No 10’s rear elevation. Hence, its impact on both the existing outlook and the sense of openness experienced by users of rear garden would be minimal. Given the large size of the rear garden and the distance of the proposed extension from it, the proposed development would not meaningfully alter the enjoyment of the garden for the occupiers of No 8.

    Taking all of the above into account, the proposed development would accord with the guidance given in paragraph 2.2.1 of the SPD1 which provides that the size and siting of an extension should not lead to an extension which is visually imposing or overbearing for neighbouring properties, including creating a sense of enclosure (that is being boxed in) or a loss of outlook when viewed from habitable room windows.

    I therefore find that the proposed development would have an acceptable effect on the living conditions of the occupiers of No 8, with particular regard to visual impact and outlook. It would comply with Core Policy 8 of the Core Strategy2 and with Policies H15, EN1, and EN2 of the Slough Local Plan (adopted 2004) which collectively provide that, amongst other things, the design of all development within the existing residential areas should respect the amenities of adjoining occupiers.

  4. Section 05

    Conditions

    I have considered the need for conditions against the advice on conditions set out in the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) and the Planning Practice Guidance (PPG).

  5. Section 06

    Conditions imposed

    Conditions are necessary, in the interests of clarity and enforceability, setting out the timescale for the commencement of development (condition 1) and the approved plans (condition 2), respectively. A condition is necessary controlling external materials to ensure that the proposed development would have an acceptable appearance (condition 3).

    Conditions are necessary preventing the extension from being used a balcony (condition 4), and to prevent any additional windows being formed on the flank elevations of the extension under permitted development (condition 5), to protect the living conditions of the occupiers of No 8 and [address], with particular regard to privacy.

  6. Section 07

    Conditions not imposed

    The windows on the flank elevation facing No 8 would be located sufficiently below the eaves of the proposed single-storey extension such that they would be screened by the existing fence along the common boundary. Thus, no actual or perceived overlooking towards the plot at No 8 would occur. Consequently, a condition requiring these windows to be obscure glazed is not necessary.

    As this appeal relates to a householder application, the biodiversity gain condition is not applicable. 1 Slough Local Development Framework Residential Extensions Guidelines Supplementary Planning Document (adopted 2010) 2 Slough Local Development Framework Core Strategy 2006 – 2026 Development Plan Document (adopted 2008)

  7. Section 08

    Conclusion

    For the reasons given above, having considered the development plan as a whole, the approach in the Framework, and all other relevant material considerations, I conclude that the appeal should be allowed.

  8. Section 09

    Conditions Schedule

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: SLP & Proposed Block Plan ([name]. 10FA/001/PL) ([name]), Existing & [name] ([name]. 10FA/002/PL) ([name]), [name] ([name]. 10FA/004/PL) ([name]).

    The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match those specified in the application form (dated: 11th April 2025).

    The roof area of the extension hereby permitted shall not be used as a balcony, roof garden or similar amenity area.

    Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) (or any order revoking and re-enacting that Order with or without modification), no windows/dormer windows other than those expressly authorised by this permission shall be constructed on the flank elevations of the development hereby permitted. End of Conditions Schedule

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 368No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    5 November 2025Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    30 October 2025 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
6000651
Application reference
P/20729/001
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Slough Borough Council
Planning authority code
E06000039

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
Not recorded
Appeal reason
refused
Type detail
Householder
Jurisdiction
No Jurisdiction Associated
Link status
Not recorded

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
0 hectares
Floor space
430 m²
Number of residences
Not recorded
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
Not recorded
Affects setting of a listed building
Yes
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
5 September 2025
Valid date
5 September 2025
Start date
10 September 2025
Planning authority decision date
27 June 2025
Appeal decision date
5 November 2025

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
Not recorded
Bespoke
Not recorded
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
No
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Back Office
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
79149
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:29
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21