Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 6001160

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

10 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

2 new semi-detached 3-bedroom bungalows.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for 2 new semi-detached 3-bedroom bungalows at [site address] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 25/00223/FULL, subject to the attached schedule of conditions.

  2. Section 03

    Appeal Procedure

    The site visit was undertaken by a representative of the Inspector whose recommendation is set out below and to which the Inspector has had regard before deciding the appeal.

  3. Section 04

    Main Issue

    The main issue is the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

  4. Section 05

    Reasons for the Recommendation

    The appeal site comprises an area of hardstanding located behind an existing bungalow at [site address] (No 29). It is situated at the edge of the Cullompton settlement boundary. The immediate surrounds consist of dwellings on one side of [address] only with No 29 the final dwelling in a line of properties. These dwellings are predominantly arranged in a linear pattern, fronting the road, set in generous plots with spacious rear gardens. The wider surrounds are mainly characterised by open countryside. [name] 29, the roadside is lined by a hedgerow which transitions into taller trees and vegetation as one moves further away from the settlement.

    The positioning of the proposed bungalows to the rear of No 29 and its immediate neighbours would not reflect the linear pattern of development to this section of [address]. However, as acknowledged by the Council, the plot is quite sizeable and the proposal would provide reasonably sized gardens and parking areas. Furthermore, due to the roadside vegetation on [address], the existing fence which bounds the appeal site, their single storey scale, together with the intervening distance from neighbouring buildings and the road, the bungalows would not appear unduly dominant or cramped.

    I am aware that the Council previously refused an application in 2022 seeking two dwellings on the site. However, in 2024 outline planning permission was granted at the site1 for the erection of a single dwelling with associated access. I accept that the site plan associated with that permission was indicative. Even so, it indicated a departure from the immediate linear pattern of development. It also envisaged a dwelling of a substantial footprint, positioned close to the side boundary with the adjoining field. As such, there is a realistic prospect that the reserved matters relating to that permission would seek a similar layout. Consequently, the appreciation of built form and spacing would be comparable, particularly in views from [address]. Therefore, these factors also indicate that when compared with the fallback of the existing outline planning permission, the development would similarly assimilate into its surroundings.

    The proposed development would therefore have an acceptable effect on the character and appearance of the area. In that regard, it would accord with the requirements in Policies DM1 of the Mid Devon Local Plan (2020) and TC02 of the Cullompton Neighbourhood Plan (2020) for effective and efficient use of sites with development that contributes positively to the character of the locality and integrates well with surrounding buildings taking account of factors including siting, layout, scale and massing.

  5. Section 06

    [name]

    Schedule 7A of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended) introduced a statutory framework for [name] (BNG), and it applies to all planning applications made on or after 12 February 2024. As such, unless exempt, development proposals are usually subject to the mandatory requirement to deliver a BNG of at least 10%.

    There is no dispute between the parties that the site does not impact a priority habitat and impacts less than [address] metres of onsite habitat, and less than 5 metres of onsite linear habitat such as hedgerows. Therefore, based on the information available, the proposed development is subject to the de minimis exemption.

  6. Section 07

    Conditions

    In addition to the standard time limit condition, it is necessary to impose a condition requiring the development to accord with the approved plans for certainty. In respect of the latter condition, I have added the 3D images drawing provided in the interests of completeness as this also reflects the elevation and floor plans.

    I have had regard to the Council’s suggested conditions. To minimise any disturbance to the living conditions of neighbouring residents a Construction Environmental Management Plan is reasonable and necessary. I have used the comprehensive wording of the condition suggested by the Council. The appellant has accepted this in principle and has not suggested any alternative wording. However, given the permission relates to two dwellings only, it would be expected that this condition be applied proportionately. 1 23/01599/OUT

    To ensure the site is suitably drained and does not increase flooding elsewhere, I have attached a condition in line with the Council’s suggestion regarding foul and surface water drainage. In this regard, the appellant has referred me to their surface water drainage strategy dated February 2025. [name] accept that the Council’s officer report confirms that the strategy appears sufficient in order to safely handle surface water amounting from the development, it is not accompanied by a plan indicating how the strategy will be implemented and it also doesn’t cover foul drainage. I have therefore adapted the suggested condition to address these matters and the appellant can incorporate their strategy into the final details if this is appropriate.

    It is also necessary for precise details of external surfaces to be approved by the Council to protect the character and appearance of the area and for acoustic fencing to be installed as per the plans for noise protection. In respect of materials, I have removed the Council’s suggested inclusion of samples of materials to be provided ‘where necessary’ as it is not clear what would trigger such a requirement. In any case, precise details would be sufficient.

    The installation of bat and bird boxes is reasonable to enhance biodiversity on the site. The Council’s decision refers to paragraph 8.1 of the appellant’s appeal statement which does not give precise details of where or when these boxes would be installed. Therefore, I have amended the suggested condition to cover these matters. For functional and highway safety purposes, visibility splays shall not be obstructed and the access, parking and turning areas indicated on the plans should be used as such. Therefore, the Council’s suggested condition in this respect should be attached.

    To prevent over development of the site, in order to protect the character and appearance of the area, the suggested condition to remove certain permitted development rights is also reasonable and necessary. I have however altered the Council’s suggested condition to remove the suggested restrictions on classes D, G and H of Schedule 2, Part 1, or Class A of Schedule 2 as such minor additions would be unlikely to have a material effect on the character and appearance of the area.

  7. Section 08

    Conclusion and Recommendation

    For the reasons given above and having had regard to all other matters raised, I recommend that the appeal should be allowed.

  8. Section 09

    Inspector’s Decision

    I have considered all the submitted evidence and my representative’s report and on that basis the appeal is allowed.

  9. Section 10

    Schedule of conditions

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with drawing [name].06.E (Site Location and Proposed Block Plan / Roof Plan), A.07 ([name] & Elevations), A.08 ([name]) and A.12 (3D Images).

    Prior to the commencement of development, a Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. In respect to the protection of residential amenity and the local environment, the CEMP shall identify the steps and procedures that will be implemented to minimise the creation and impact of noise, vibration, dust and waste disposal resulting from the site preparation, groundwork and construction phases of the development and manage Heavy/[name] access to the site. It shall include details of the hours of operation and measures to be employed to prevent the egress of mud, water and other detritus onto the public and any non-adopted highways. The following specific details should also be included in respect to highway safety: (a) the timetable of the works (b) daily hours of construction; (c) any road closure; (d) hours during which delivery and construction traffic will travel to and from the site, with such vehicular movements being restricted to between 8:00am and 6:00pm Mondays to Fridays inclusive; 9:00am to 1:00pm Saturdays, and no such vehicular movements taking place on Sundays and any /Public Holidays unless agreed by the Local Planning Authority in advance; (e) the number and sizes of vehicles visiting the site in connection with the development and the frequency of their visits; (f) the compound/location where all building materials, finished or unfinished products, parts, crates, packing materials and waste will be stored during the demolition and construction phases; (g) areas on-site where delivery vehicles and construction traffic will load or unload building materials, finished or unfinished products, parts, crates, packing materials and waste with confirmation that no construction traffic or delivery vehicles will park on the County highway for loading or unloading purposes, unless prior written agreement has been given by the Local Planning Authority. This may include the establishment of a ‘wait away’ system for all deliveries; (h) hours during which no construction traffic will be present at the site; (i) the means of enclosure of the site during construction works; (j) details of proposals to promote car sharing amongst construction staff in order to limit construction staff vehicles parking off-site; (k) details of wheel washing facilities and obligations; (l) the proposed route of all construction traffic exceeding 7.5 tonnes; (m) details of the amount and location of construction worker parking; and (n) photographic evidence of the condition of adjacent public highway prior to commencement of any work. The approved Construction Environmental Management Plan shall be adhered to throughout the construction period of the development.

    No development shall begin until precise details of a drainage scheme, including an accompanying plan showing foul and surface water drainage provision and measures so as to prevent the discharge of surface water onto the public highway, have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The drainage scheme shall then be installed in full accordance with the approved details prior to the dwellings hereby permitted being first occupied and shall thereafter be retained and maintained at all times.

    Prior to their use on site, precise details of the materials for all the external surfaces of the buildings shall have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The development shall then only be carried out in full accordance with the approved materials.

    Acoustic fencing shall be provided in accordance with the details indicated on approved [name].06.E, and with the submitted ‘[name], prior to the first occupation of the dwellings hereby permitted. Following its installation, the acoustic fencing shall be retained and maintained in perpetuity.

    Before first occupation of the dwellings hereby approved, precise details of three bat boxes and four bird boxes to be installed on retained trees, or the buildings within the site, in accordance with the recommendations detailed in Section 8.1 ([name] and [name]) of the submitted ‘Planning Appeal Statement and [name] shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Once approved the boxes shall be installed prior to first occupation of the dwellings and shall be retained and maintained in perpetuity.

    There shall be no obstruction to visibility greater than 0.[address] level forward of the visibility splays shown on approved drawing [name].06.[name] visibility splays shall be fully provided before the dwellings hereby permitted are first occupied and shall thereafter be maintained at all times.

    The areas indicated for access, parking and turning on the approved drawing [name].06.E shall be kept clear of obstruction and shall not be used other than for access and the parking and turning of vehicles associated with the development hereby permitted.

    Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 3 of The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development)(England) Order 2015 (or any Order revoking and re-enacting that Order with or without modification) (the Order) no development of the types referred to in [name], AA, B, C, and E, of Schedule 2, Part 1, or Class A of Schedule 2, Part 2 of Schedule 2 of the Order shall be undertaken within the application site without the Local Planning Authority first granting planning permission.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 121No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    14 April 2026Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    8 January 2026 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
6001160
Application reference
25/00223/FULL.
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Mid Devon District Council
Planning authority code
E07000042

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appeal type reason
Not recorded
Appeal reason
refused
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
No Jurisdiction Associated
Link status
Not recorded

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
0 hectares
Floor space
957 m²
Number of residences
2
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Yes
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
No
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
17 October 2025
Valid date
17 October 2025
Start date
21 October 2025
Planning authority decision date
23 April 2025
Appeal decision date
14 April 2026

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
Not recorded
Bespoke
Not recorded
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
No
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Back Office-s78
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
87335
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:29
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Record updated
20 August 2026 at 16:29