Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 6001163

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

7 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

change of use from A2 (office) to A3 (restaurant) with ancillary A5 without complying with a condition attached to planning permission [name]/03283/014, dated 18 December 2018.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for change of use from A2 (office) to A3 (restaurant) with ancillary A5 without complying with condition No 3 attached to planning permission [name]/03283/014, dated 18 December 2018, but subject to the conditions in the attached schedule.

  2. Section 03

    Background and Main Issue

    The appeal property is operating as a restaurant and hot food takeaway. The appellant wishes to extend the opening hours from those originally imposed to 08:00 – 02:00 daily.

    The Council refused the application for the reason that it would be harmful to the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, due to noise and disturbance from the operation of the restaurant/take-away and comings and goings at unsociable hours.

    The main issue is therefore the effect that varying the opening hours would have on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular regard to noise and disturbance.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    The appeal site is located on the eastern side of [site address] within a row of terraced properties which have commercial units at ground floor and residential use on the upper floors. There is a service road to the rear of the appeal site, beyond which are further residential properties on [address]. On the opposite side of [site address] are large commercial units and their associated parking areas.

    At my site visit during a weekday afternoon, I saw that the site is in a vibrant and busy mixed-use area. [site address] is a principal route through Slough and I saw constant vehicle movements, including frequent bus services stopping in close proximity to the site. As a result, there was a continuous level of background noise associated with traffic flows and general activity in the area. [name] appreciate my visit can only be a snapshot in time, I have no reason to believe that what I experienced was not typical of circumstances at this site. However, I also acknowledge that activity levels and associated ambient noise levels are likely to reduce overnight.

    The evidence submitted indicates that commercial premises in the area have a variety of opening hours. Both parties refer to two nearby premises at 246 and 248 [site address] which operate as restaurants with ancillary takeaway facilities and which were granted planning permission to open until 02:00. The Council states that, since those permissions were granted, the concentration of late-night uses in the area has intensified as the former bank premises at 230-234 [site address] has been split into three individual businesses.

    I observed a number of takeaways, restaurants, bars and cafés in the vicinity of the appeal site. It is suggested that the arrival of customers at, and their congregation outside, these premises during the evenings and early hours of the morning has resulted in of noise and disturbance, to the detriment of neighbouring occupiers.

    However, there is no evidence submitted to show that those units with later opening hours have generated unacceptable levels of noise and disturbance. There is also nothing before me to demonstrate that there is an over concentration of restaurant / takeaway uses resulting in noise and disturbance to neighbouring occupiers. Moreover, I note that the Council’s Environmental Protection consultee confirms they have no complaints recorded.

    Thus, in the absence of substantive evidence to the contrary, I do not find that allowing the appeal premises to open until 02:00 would be harmful to the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers. Consequently, I find no conflict with Core Policy 8 of the Slough Local Development Framework Core Strategy Development Plan Document 2008. This policy requires, amongst other things, that development respects its location and surroundings and does not give rise to unacceptable levels of pollution, including noise.

  4. Section 05

    Conditions

    Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) makes clear that decision notices for the grant of planning permission under section 73 should also restate the conditions imposed on earlier permissions that continue to have effect. As the development that was originally granted planning permission has been started, it is not necessary to impose a time limit condition. I have no information before me about the status of the other conditions imposed on the original planning permission, therefore I shall impose all those that I consider remain relevant. In the event that some have in fact been discharged, that is a matter which can be addressed by the parties. I have modified the wording of some conditions in accordance with the PPG for reasons of precision and enforceability.

  5. Section 06

    Conclusion

    Based on the above considerations, I conclude that the proposal accords with the development plan and the appeal should be allowed.

  6. Section 07

    Schedule of Conditions

    The development hereby approved shall be implemented only in accordance with the following plans and drawings hereby approved unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. (a) [name]. 2018-0202-001, Dated 14.11.2018 (b) [name]. 2018-0202-002, Dated 13.11.2018 (c) [name]. 2018-0202-003, Dated 13.11.2018 (d) Undated 5no. A4 sheets relating to [name] TCBBx2/TCBTx2 Series (e) Design & [name], [name] 2018

    The premises shall only be open for customers between 08:00 – 02:00 Monday – Sunday.

    The use shall not take place until such time as residual and recycling bins have been provided on site in accordance with details to be approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The refuse bins shall be retained on site thereafter.

    Prior to first occupation details of measures for the disposal of fats, oils and grease, installation details for a fat trap(s), the collection of waste oil by a contractor, particularly to recycle for the production of bio diesel (inline with best practice guidance) hereby granted permission have been submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority and these approved details shall be implemented on site prior to first occupation of the development and shall be maintained in perpetuity.

    The use hereby permitted shall not operate unless a ventilation system is installed which includes a filtration system capable of neutralising odours. The filtration system shall at all times be installed, maintained and operated so as to prevent nuisance to neighbouring residents caused by cooking odours.

    All plant, machinery and equipment (including refrigeration, extractor flue and air conditioning systems) to be used by the reason of the granting of this permission shall be so installed, maintained and operated so as to prevent the transmission of noise and vibration into any neighbouring premises.

    No public/customer entrance or exit shall be provided via the doors to the rear of the premises. The public/customers shall only enter and exit the premises using the entrance fronting [site address] .

    All loading and unloading of delivery vehicles shall take place at the rear of the premises and there shall be no means of vehicular access or loading/unloading of goods at the front of the premises. No vehicles for delivery purposes may arrive, depart, be loaded or unloaded except between the hours of 08:00 and 18:00 Mondays to Fridays, and 08:00 and 13:00 hours on Saturdays, and at no time on Sundays and [name]. End of Conditions

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 4682No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    3 March 2026Matches the official casework database

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
6001163
Application reference
P/03283/021
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Slough Borough Council
Planning authority code
E06000039

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Minor retail and services
Appeal type reason
Not recorded
Appeal reason
refused
Type detail
Removal or Variation of Conditions
Jurisdiction
No Jurisdiction Associated
Link status
Not recorded

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
0 hectares
Floor space
123 m²
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Yes
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
No
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
17 October 2025
Valid date
10 November 2025
Start date
10 November 2025
Planning authority decision date
12 June 2025
Appeal decision date
3 March 2026

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
Not recorded
Bespoke
Not recorded
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
No
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Back Office-s78
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
85253
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:29
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21