Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 6002642

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

6 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

for a single storey extension to the front elevation.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for the single storey extension to the front elevation at [site address] , Worcester [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 25/00781/HP, subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with drawings and associated documents submitted with the application, titled: Location & Block (Page 1), [name] (Page 2) and [name] (Page 3), dated August 2025.

    The external materials of the extension hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building/dwelling.

    Demolition, clearance, or construction works shall take place only between the hours of 08:00 and 18:00 Mondays to Fridays and between the hours of 09:00 and 13:00 on Saturdays, and shall not take place at any time on Sundays or on Bank or Public Holidays. There shall be no deliveries to the development arranged for outside of these approved hours.

  2. Section 03

    Main Issue

    The main issue is the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the appeal property and the surrounding area.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    The appeal property, [site address] (No 188) is a two-storey brick-built mid-terrace house dating from the late 20th century. Vehicular access is to the rear of the property and to the front No 188 has an open, lawned garden area, facing a public footpath and communal grassed area. The front garden slopes down towards No 188 and, in common with its immediate neighbours, the dwelling is set down from the communal area. The building line of the terrace steps forward immediately to the west of No 188, and the appeal property abuts the gable flank wall of the neighbouring [address] (No 186).

    The appeal site is in an established residential area, comprising short terraces or semi-detached houses of similar design. The housing estate has an informal layout, with some properties facing the street and other groups facing communal soft landscaped areas. Slight changes in level between houses and occasional mature trees add to the informal character of the immediate area.

    The proposed development is a single-storey, flat-roofed extension to the front elevation, situated between the projecting porch to No 188 and the return wall of the gable end of No 186.The front wall of the extension would project forward of the porch by approximately 1.5m and would align with the front wall of the adjacent No 186, and the section of the terrace of which it forms a part.

    Although to the front elevation of No 188, the impact of the extension would be significantly reduced due to its siting against the return wall of No 186 and the projecting porch of the host dwelling. Its prominence would also be reduced due to the sunken level of the appeal property relative to the public spaces to the front of the site.

    The proposed development would be barely visible in views from the west, and there would be limited visibility of the extension from the confined public spaces opposite and to the east of No 188.

    Whilst the flat roof of the proposed extension would not match the pitched roof of the main terrace, the intended roof design would reduce the bulk and prominence of the extension. It would be in a discreet location and its flat-roofed form would not be unexpected in the context of a late 20th century housing estate, particularly given the estate’s informal character. Additionally, the materials of the extension would otherwise match that of the host dwelling.

    The South Worcestershire Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document, (the SPD) 2018, notes the potential vulnerability of front elevations to unsympathetic extensions. However, the extension would not be in a prominent location, due to being within the return with the adjoining gable wall and its set down position. Given these circumstances, allied with the informal layout of buildings in the immediate vicinity, the development would be in accordance with the overall objectives of the SPD.

    For the reasons given above the proposed development would not harm the character and appearance of the appeal property and the surrounding area. Therefore, I find no conflict with Policy SWDP 21 of the South Worcestershire Development Plan, 2016, in so far as it seeks to promote high quality design which complements the character of an area and responds to surrounding buildings, as well as accordance with policies of the National Planning Policy Framework, 2024, that pertain to the achievement of well-designed places.

  4. Section 05

    Conditions

    In addition to the standard time condition, I have imposed a condition requiring that the development is carried out following the approved plans, for the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of certainty.

    I have also imposed a condition for materials to match those used on the existing house to maintain the character and appearance of the area.

    Given the proximity of the site to existing dwellings, a condition limiting the hours of construction on the site would be reasonable and necessary in the interests of the living conditions of neighbouring occupants.

    In response to the planning application the Council’s Landscape Officer has requested provision of a bird box as biodiversity enhancement. The development would involve the loss of a negligible area of shrubbery and no loss of trees or bushes. On that basis, I am unable to conclude such a condition is necessary.

  5. Section 06

    Conclusion

    For the reasons given above, having considered the development plan, along with all other relevant material considerations, I conclude that the appeal should be allowed subject to conditions.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 4598No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    10 February 2026Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    28 January 2026 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
6002642
Application reference
25/00781/HP
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Worcester City Council
Planning authority code
E07000237

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
Not recorded
Appeal reason
refused
Type detail
Householder
Jurisdiction
No Jurisdiction Associated
Link status
Not recorded

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
0 hectares
Floor space
5 m²
Number of residences
Not recorded
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
Not recorded
Affects setting of a listed building
Yes
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
15 December 2025
Valid date
15 December 2025
Start date
19 December 2025
Planning authority decision date
28 November 2025
Appeal decision date
10 February 2026

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
Not recorded
Bespoke
Not recorded
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
No
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Back Office
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
84164
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:29
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21