Skip to main content
Official casework recordDismissedCurrent release

Appeal 6002685

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

6 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

change of use of first floor (Class E) to 4no. one-bed apartments (Class C3).

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is dismissed.

  2. Section 03

    Preliminary Matters

    The appeal is made pursuant to Schedule 2, Part 3, Class MA of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England), Order 2015 (as amended) (GPDO). Development is permitted under Class MA where it consists of a change of use of a building and any land within its curtilage from a use falling within Class E (commercial, business and service) of Schedule 2 to the Use Classes Order to a use falling within Class C3 (dwellinghouses).

    [name].1 of Class MA sets out several requirements, including that the building must fall within one or more of the classes specified for a continuous period of at least two years prior to the date of the application for prior approval. Further to this, [name].2 sets out that development under Class MA is permitted subject to, amongst other aspects, an application to the local planning authority for a determination as to whether prior approval is required in relation to the conditions set out.

    The decision notice identifies two reasons for refusal, one of which concerns whether the existing use of the building, specifically the first‐floor area, falls within Class E. At appeal, the Council accepted that, in light of the evidence submitted, this matter has been satisfactorily addressed and no longer forms a point of dispute. Accordingly, I have not considered this issue further in my assessment of the appeal.

  3. Section 04

    Main Issue

    The main issue is therefore whether the proposal would provide adequate living conditions for future occupiers with regard to the provision of internal space.

  4. Section 05

    Reasons

    Section 3 (9A) of the GPDO notes that Schedule 2 does not grant permission for or authorise any development of any new dwellinghouse where the gross internal floor area is less than 37m2 or that does not comply with the [name] (NDSS).

    The proposed development comprises four one‐bedroom apartments. In each unit, the sleeping area would be located on a mezzanine level accessed via an internal staircase. The Council contends that the inclusion of a mezzanine floor constitutes an additional storey for the purposes of applying the NDSS. On this basis, the Council considers the scheme to fall within the two‐storey dwelling category.

    Under the NDSS, a one‐bedroom, two‐person dwelling arranged over two storeys is required to provide a minimum gross internal floor area of 58 m2. However, this requirement applies specifically to a one‐bedroom, two‐person dwelling. The appellant maintains that each apartment is designed to accommodate a single occupant, a position supported by the submitted plans, which clearly show the provision of one single bed per unit.

    Referring back to the NDSS, there is no defined minimum internal floor area for a one‐bedroom, one‐person dwelling arranged over two storeys. In the absence of such a standard, it would be unreasonable to assess the proposal against a requirement that, in policy terms, does not exist.

    My attention now turns to the matter of headroom within each apartment. The introduction of a mezzanine level would inevitably reduce the available headspace across the first floor of each unit, while also positioning the sleeping area closer to the existing ceiling. The NDSS makes clear that any area with a headroom of less than 1.5 m should not be counted as usable floor space, except where it is used solely for storage, for which the proposal would not be used.

    There is, however, no substantive evidence before me confirming the finished headroom either within the proposed bed‐space or within the habitable area beneath each mezzanine. In the absence of clear evidence demonstrating that the required headroom would be achieved, I cannot be satisfied that the development would comply with the relevant standard.

    On this basis, I must conclude that the proposal fails to meet the requirements of Section 3(9A) of the GPDO, which does not permit development that does not accord with the NDSS.

  5. Section 06

    Conclusion

    For the reason given above, the proposal would not satisfy Section 3 (9A) of the GPDO. Therefore, prior approval is not given. I conclude that the appeal is dismissed.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 4No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    27 March 2026Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    24 March 2026 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
6002685
Application reference
P/25/1997/2
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Charnwood Borough Council
Planning authority code
E07000130

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Change of use
Appeal type reason
Not recorded
Appeal reason
refused
Type detail
Prior Approval
Jurisdiction
No Jurisdiction Associated
Link status
Not recorded

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
0 hectares
Floor space
162 m²
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Yes
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
No
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Dismissed
Decision category
Dismissed
Received date
16 December 2025
Valid date
16 December 2025
Start date
8 January 2026
Planning authority decision date
24 November 2025
Appeal decision date
27 March 2026

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
Not recorded
Bespoke
Not recorded
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
No
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Back Office-s78
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
86648
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:29
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Record updated
20 August 2026 at 16:29