Appeal 6002809
Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.
A clearer next step
See how Inspectors approached issues like yours
Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.
- See which issues the decision appears to turn on
- Compare the facts and open the full appeal records
One private comparison
How the refusal review worksOne-off service · No subscription
Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.
Official decision document
The decision, section by section
7 sections
Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.
Section 01
Development description
extension and alterations.
Section 02
Decision
The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for extension and alteration at [site address] in accordance with the terms of the application, [name]/25/03701, and the plans submitted with it, subject to the conditions in the attached schedule.
Section 03
Main Issue
The main issue is the effect of the proposal on character and appearance.
Section 04
Reasons
The appeal property comprises a single storey residential dwelling set within a spacious, irregular shaped plot. The existing bungalow is of modest proportions, comprising two principal blocks connected by a small link extension. It is of no particular architectural merit owing to its piecemeal form and varying roof forms.
The appeal building is discreet within the wider streetscene due to its limited height and its location set behind various boundary treatments, including substantial fencing and landscaping. Accordingly, it has a neutral contribution to the character and appearance of the locality which comprises an eclectic mix of dwellings.
The appeal property would remain single storey in height and would not be materially higher than the existing ridge height. The varying roof profiles would not be wholly discordant with the existing dwelling and, in any event, would not be unduly prominent within the streetscene given its limited height and recessed position within the plot. Furthermore, the height of the roofs of neighbouring properties vary and are predominantly greater than that of the existing appeal dwelling. Accordingly, it would not appear incongruous in the streetscene.
I am mindful that the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) supports development proposals that are sympathetic to local character and history, including the surrounding built environment and landscape setting, while not preventing or discouraging appropriate innovation or change. Therefore, whilst the proposal would result in a sizeable increase in footprint and the inclusion of varying roof profiles it would not be harmful to the appearance of the existing property, and would remain proportionate to the plot in which the appeal dwelling lies. The contemporary palette of external materials, including the use of timber cladding, would enhance the visual appearance of the property. Furthermore, I do not concur that the proposal would be visually dominant such that it would be detrimental to the character and appearance of the appeal property or the wider streetscene.
For the reasons stated, the proposal would not be materially harmful to character and appearance. The proposal therefore accords with Policies LP03 and LP24 of the Babergh and Mid Suffolk Joint Local Plan (2023). Collectively, and amongst other things, these require residential extensions to incorporate a high standard of design which maintains or enhances the character and appearance of the buildings, streetscene and surroundings. They also require proposals not to result in over-development of the plot and to retain suitable amenity space. Similarly, the proposal accords with the design principles of the Framework, as set out above.
Section 05
Conditions
In addition to the statutory time limit condition, in the interests of certainty I have imposed a condition requiring compliance with the submitted plans. Conditions to secure measures to enhance biodiversity are also necessary, in accordance with the requirements of relevant development plan policies.
In the interests of ecology and biodiversity I have imposed a condition for compliance with the submitted Bat Assessment and [name] plan. However, given the limited scale and nature of development proposed within an established residential plot it is not reasonable or necessary to require the submission of further detail for approval by the local planning authority in the form of a biodiversity enhancement strategy.
Section 06
Conclusion
For the reasons stated the proposal complies with the development plan when read as a whole. The appeal is therefore allowed.
Section 07
Schedule of Conditions
The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision.
The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: 1715-01 - Site Plan, 1715-03 - [name] and Elevations and 1715-07 Roof Plan/[name].
All mitigation measures and/or works identified within the Bat Assessment ([name], May 2025) shall be implemented in full and maintained as such in perpetuity. ***End of Schedule***
Planning inspector and document dates
The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.
Appeal Decision
- Extracted inspector · page 1
- Inspector attribution ID 5483No official casework-database value to compare
- Extracted decision date · page 1
- 4 March 2026Matches the official casework database
- Extracted site visit dates
- 24 February 2026 (page 1)
Reference and authority
Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.
- Case reference
- 6002809
- Application reference
- DC/25/03701
- Lead case reference
- Not recorded
- Planning authority
- Babergh District Council
- Planning authority code
- E07000200
Casework details
The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.
- Casework type
- Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development type
- Householder developments
- Appeal type reason
- Not recorded
- Appeal reason
- refused
- Type detail
- Householder
- Jurisdiction
- No Jurisdiction Associated
- Link status
- Not recorded
Site and development
Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.
- Site area
- 0 hectares
- Floor space
- 3,360 m²
- Number of residences
- Not recorded
- Site in Green Belt
- No
- Agricultural holding
- Not recorded
- Affects setting of a listed building
- Yes
- Historic building grant made
- Not recorded
- Relates to a conservation area
- Not recorded
- Flooding is an issue
- Not recorded
- Site within an AONB
- Not recorded
- Site within an SSSI
- Not recorded
Decision and dates
The published outcome and every imported case date.
- Official decision
- Allowed
- Decision category
- Allowed
- Received date
- 18 December 2025
- Valid date
- 18 December 2025
- Start date
- 13 January 2026
- Planning authority decision date
- 21 October 2025
- Appeal decision date
- 4 March 2026
Case administration
Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.
- Redetermined
- Not recorded
- Bespoke
- Not recorded
- Date recovered
- Not recorded
- Date not recovered or derecovered
- Not recorded
- Call-in date
- Not recorded
- Costs applied for
- No
- Enforcement grounds count
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds
- Not recorded
Source and catalogue history
When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.
- Source
- Planning Inspectorate casework database
- Source data system
- Back Office
- Dataset status
- Current release
- Catalogue record ID
- 85355
- First seen
- 20 August 2026 at 14:25
- Last seen
- 20 August 2026 at 16:29
- Removed from release
- Not recorded
- Record created
- 20 August 2026 at 14:25
- Record updated
- 24 August 2026 at 16:21