Appeal 6002925
Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.
A clearer next step
See how Inspectors approached issues like yours
Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.
- See which issues the decision appears to turn on
- Compare the facts and open the full appeal records
One private comparison
How the refusal review worksOne-off service · No subscription
Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.
Official decision document
The decision, section by section
10 sections
Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.
Section 01
Development description
alteration of existing modern extension including changes to fenestration and replacement of chimney stack with bay window.
Section 02
Decisions
Appeal A is allowed and planning permission is granted for alteration of existing modern extension including changes to fenestration and replacement of chimney stack with bay window at [site address] [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, reference: DM/25/2369 and subject to the conditions in the attached schedule.
Appeal B is allowed and listed building consent is granted for alteration of existing modern extension including changes to fenestration and replacement of chimney stack with bay window at [site address] [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, reference: DM/25/2370 and subject to the conditions in the attached schedule.
Section 03
Preliminary Matters
As the appeal relates to a listed building, I have had special regard to sections 16(2) and 66(1) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 (the Act).
Section 04
Main Issue
Section 05
Reasons
[site address] is a [name] listed building, which dates back to the 18th century. It is two storeys high, with attic. The front elevation is finished with white weatherboarding and features traditional casement windows. The end walls are constructed with red brick, with some burnt headers, which is laid in English bond. The historic part of the building has a Horsham slab roof, with a chimney on either side of the building. The listed building has a modern, rear extension, which is constructed of red brick. The extension features full height glazed doors, dormer windows and a large chimney on the gable end.
Based on my site visit and the evidence before me, I find that the listed building’s special interest, insofar as is relevant to these appeals is derived from its historic and architectural interest, as an illustration of 18th century domestic architecture. The building’s surviving historic fabric, use of traditional materials and its pleasing architectural style and design make important contributions in these regards.
The proposal seeks to demolish an existing chimney and make changes to the fenestration on the rear projection. Given that this part of the building was constructed in the late-20th century, the proposal would not result in the loss of any historic fabric. The chimney that is proposed to be removed is of limited architectural merit. The modern chimney has a large base that dominates the rear elevation of the building. While glimpses of the modern chimney stack are visible from the public realm, the eye is drawn to the historic part of the building and its taller, chimney stacks. I do not find that the modern chimney stack adds to the building’s significance or special interest. Consequently, I do not find that its removal would cause any harm to the special interest of the listed building.
The proposed bay window would be modest in size and would utilise traditional materials. It would be sited on a modern part of the building, which currently features full height glazing and dormer windows. The proposal would appear subservient in respect to the rear elevation and I do not find it would appear out of character on the modern part of the building. Overall, I find that the proposed bay window would preserve the special interest of the listed building.
The proposal would also result in alterations to the fenestration on the late-20th century part of the building. The Council raises no objection to this part of the proposal and based on the evidence before me and my site visit, I find no reason to reach a contrary conclusion to the Council on this matter.
For the reasons given above, I conclude that the proposal would preserve the special interest of the listed building. Consequently, the proposal would satisfy the requirements of the Act and the historic environment policies within the Framework. The proposal would also comply with Policies DP26 and DP34 of the Mid Sussex District Plan 2014 – 2031 adopted March 2018. These policies among other things seek to promote well located and designed development, which protects the valued characteristics of the built environment for their historical and visual qualities and that alterations or extensions to a listed building respect its historic form, scale, significance and fabric. Appeal Decisions – Appeal A: 6002923 and Appeal B: 6002925
Section 06
Other Matters
The appeal site lies within the High Weald National Landscape. Given the modest nature of the proposal, the Council confirms that the appeal scheme would conserve the landscape and scenic beauty of the National Landscape. Based on my site visit and the evidence before me, I find no reason to reach a contrary conclusion to the Council on this matter.
Section 07
Conditions
In the interests of certainty, a condition specifying timescales is required for both appeals and an approved plans condition is required for Appeal A. An approved plans condition is not necessary for Appeal B as there is no provision for a minor material amendment to a listed building consent. Conditions in respect to external materials and detailing are required to ensure that the proposed works assimilate well with the existing building.
Section 08
Conclusion
Appeal A - For the reasons given above, having regard to the development plan as a whole and all other relevant material considerations, I conclude that the appeal should be allowed.
Appeal B - For the above reasons and having regard to all other matters raised, I conclude that this appeal should be allowed.
Section 09
Appeal A
The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision.
The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with drawing nos: 2505BU_R0_000; 2505BU_R0_100; 2505BU_R0_101; 2505BU_R0_102; and, 2505BU_R0_103.
Section 10
Appeal B
The works authorised by this consent shall begin not later than three years from the date of this consent
The new hung tile required to make good the first floor of the building where the chimney is removed shall be clay tile to match the existing adjacent material in colour, texture and profile.
The new brickwork at ground floor to make good where the existing window is removed shall match the existing adjacent material in colour, texture and bonding pattern and in colour, texture and style of pointing.
Planning inspector and document dates
The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.
Appeal Decision
- Extracted inspector · page 1
- Inspector attribution ID 5777No official casework-database value to compare
- Extracted decision date · page 1
- 26 March 2026Matches the official casework database
- Extracted site visit dates
- 6 March 2026 (page 1)
Reference and authority
Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.
- Case reference
- 6002925
- Application reference
- DM/25/2370
- Lead case reference
- Not recorded
- Planning authority
- Mid Sussex District Council
- Planning authority code
- E07000228
Casework details
The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.
- Casework type
- Listed Building Consent & Conservation Area Consent Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development type
- Householder developments
- Appeal type reason
- Not recorded
- Appeal reason
- refused
- Type detail
- No Application Type Assocaited
- Jurisdiction
- No Jurisdiction Associated
- Link status
- Not recorded
Site and development
Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.
- Site area
- 0 hectares
- Floor space
- 2,639 m²
- Number of residences
- 0
- Site in Green Belt
- No
- Agricultural holding
- Not recorded
- Affects setting of a listed building
- Yes
- Historic building grant made
- Not recorded
- Relates to a conservation area
- Not recorded
- Flooding is an issue
- Not recorded
- Site within an AONB
- Yes
- Site within an SSSI
- Not recorded
Decision and dates
The published outcome and every imported case date.
- Official decision
- Allowed
- Decision category
- Allowed
- Received date
- 19 December 2025
- Valid date
- 19 December 2025
- Start date
- 21 January 2026
- Planning authority decision date
- 12 November 2025
- Appeal decision date
- 26 March 2026
Case administration
Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.
- Redetermined
- Not recorded
- Bespoke
- Not recorded
- Date recovered
- Not recorded
- Date not recovered or derecovered
- Not recorded
- Call-in date
- Not recorded
- Costs applied for
- No
- Enforcement grounds count
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds
- Not recorded
Source and catalogue history
When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.
- Source
- Planning Inspectorate casework database
- Source data system
- Back Office-s78
- Dataset status
- Current release
- Catalogue record ID
- 86567
- First seen
- 20 August 2026 at 14:25
- Last seen
- 20 August 2026 at 16:29
- Removed from release
- Not recorded
- Record created
- 20 August 2026 at 14:25
- Record updated
- 20 August 2026 at 16:29