Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 6002959

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

7 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

single storey rear extension.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for single storey rear extension at [site address] in accordance with the terms of the application, [name]/2025/0085/FF, and the plans submitted with it, subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision.

    The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the approved plans: Location Plan (scale 1:1250) and [name] and [name]. 002 [name].

  2. Section 03

    [name]

    The description of development in the above banner heading has been taken from the original application form. The Council’s decision notice includes the demolition of the existing conservatory, and I have determined the appeal accordingly.

  3. Section 04

    Main Issue

    The main issue of the appeal is the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of number [address] (No. 55) with particular regard to outlook.

  4. Section 05

    Reasons

    The appeal property relates to a semi-detached dormer bungalow which is enclosed by a tall fence to the rear which separates the property from its neighbour at No. 55 which is located to the south.

    The host property already benefits from a conservatory to the rear, and the proposed development would replace this structure with a single storey rear extension.

    The existing conservatory projects approximately 4 metres from the rear and whilst the proposed extension would be wider and taller to its ridge given its apex nature, it would project less from the rear elevation being 3.8 metres in depth. It would also remain to be single storey of a low height.

    The extension would be visible from No. 55. However, its low height and apex roof form, together with its limited overall depth ensures that the proposed development would not represent a visually overbearing/dominating feature for the occupiers of No. 55. Further, I do not find the proposed extension to be of notable size over and above that of the existing conservatory which already sits close to the neighbouring boundary. Its proposed solid mass would not alter my findings as it is an acceptable size/design for a residential property in this location. Any impact over and above the existing conservatory would be minimal and would not detrimentally alter the relationship that exists between the host property and No.55.

    I appreciate that due to the projection of the extension from the rear elevation, it would be a breach against the guidelines set out in the [name] and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document, 2013 (SPD). However, the existing conservatory already extends further than that proposed, and I find that the proposed development does not conflict with the overall principle of the guidelines which amongst other matters, encourage sympathetic designs that respect the original property and surrounding area.

    Given that the extension is replacing an existing conservatory and is acceptable in size and scale, I conclude that the proposed development would not have an unacceptable impact on the living conditions of the occupiers of No. 55 in relation to outlook. The proposed development would therefore comply with Policy SD4 (b) of the [site address] Local Plan, 2018 which explains amongst other matters that development will be permitted where it will not have a significant adverse impact on the amenities of occupiers of existing or proposed nearby land and buildings. For the same reasons, the proposed development would also accord with the guidance contained within the SPD.

  5. Section 06

    Conditions

    Conditions relating to the standard time for commencement of development and a plans condition are necessary in the interests of certainty. A condition relating to materials is also required in the interests of the satisfactory appearance of the development.

  6. Section 07

    Conclusion

    For the reasons given above and having had regard to the development plan as a whole, the appeal is allowed, and planning permission is given subject to the attached conditions.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 4321No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    11 March 2026Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    3 March 2026 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
6002959
Application reference
R/2025/0085/FF
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council
Planning authority code
E06000003

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
Not recorded
Appeal reason
refused
Type detail
Householder
Jurisdiction
No Jurisdiction Associated
Link status
Not recorded

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
0 hectares
Floor space
330 m²
Number of residences
Not recorded
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
Not recorded
Affects setting of a listed building
Yes
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
21 December 2025
Valid date
21 December 2025
Start date
15 January 2026
Planning authority decision date
29 September 2025
Appeal decision date
11 March 2026

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
Not recorded
Bespoke
Not recorded
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
No
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Back Office
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
85755
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:29
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21