Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 6005686

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

4 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

change of use of first and second floors to create self-contained apartments.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and prior approval is deemed to be granted under the provisions of Article 3(1) and Schedule 2, Part 3, Class MA as well as Part 3, Class W sub-paragraph 11(c) of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) for change of use of first and second floors to create self-contained apartments at [site address] in accordance with the application reference 25/0346 and the details submitted with it including plans numbered 142624/103 and 142624/104.

  2. Section 03

    Reasons

    Class MA of Part 3 of Schedule 2 of the GPDO (Class MA) defines as permitted development the change in use of a building from a use falling within Class E (commercial, business and service) to a use falling within Class C3 (dwellinghouses) of Schedule 2 of the Town and Country Planning ([name]) Order 1987 (as amended). The first and second floor of the appeal property are vacant offices and so their use falls within Class E.

    Development under Class MA is permitted subject to conditions as set out under paragraph MA.2. These include a requirement that a developer must apply to the local planning authority for a determination as to whether prior approval is required as to a number of identified matters. This appeal follows on from such an application by the appellant to the Council.

    Class W of Part 3 of Schedule 2 of the GPDO (Class W) includes further provisions on prior approval applications. Of relevance in this case is sub-paragraph (11)(c) under Class W. This allows development under Class MA to commence on the expiry of 56 days following the date on which a prior approval application was received by the local planning authority and where the authority has failed to notify the applicant as to whether prior approval is given or refused.

    An acknowledgement letter from the Council dated 14 April 2025 states the application leading to this appeal was accepted as being valid as of 31 March

    The same letter gives a decision due date of 25 May 2025.

    I am advised the Council requested a flood risk assessment that was provided by the appellant on 17 July 2025. However, the appellant’s appeal statement claims the Council has never issued a decision on the prior approval application. In support of this contention the appellant includes an email from a Council officer dated 4 February 2026 apologising for the delay in the Council issuing a decision notice on the application. Moreover, the Council has not sought to claim through its response to this appeal that a decision notice on the application has been issued. Therefore, I conclude that 56 days have expired since the application leading to this appeal was received by the Council and that the Council has not notified the appellant as to whether prior approval is granted or refused within the prescribed 56 day period. In light of sub-paragraph 11(c) of Class W, the appeal development can be commenced.

    Comments from consultees on the prior approval application raise concerns with the development. However, the Council’s failure to refuse prior approval within the statutory 56 day period means I am unable to address the acceptability of the appeal development against the matters listed under paragraph MA.2.

  3. Section 04

    Conclusion

    For the above reasons, the appeal is allowed and prior approval is deemed to be granted. The appellant’s attention is brought to the conditions as set out under Section MA.2 of Class MA and paragraph (12) under Class W.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 113No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    21 May 2026Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    19 May 2026 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
6005686
Application reference
25/0346
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council
Planning authority code
E08000030

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Major dwellings
Appeal type reason
Not recorded
Appeal reason
not_received
Type detail
Prior Approval
Jurisdiction
No Jurisdiction Associated
Link status
Not recorded

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
0 hectares
Floor space
924 m²
Number of residences
16
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Yes
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
No
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
27 February 2026
Valid date
27 February 2026
Start date
4 March 2026
Planning authority decision date
27 August 2025
Appeal decision date
21 May 2026

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
Not recorded
Bespoke
Not recorded
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
No
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Back Office-s78
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
89167
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:29
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Record updated
20 August 2026 at 16:29