Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 6006318

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

4 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

white rendering to all elevations.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for white rendering to all elevations of [site address] , in accordance with the terms of the application, reference DM/25/03030/FPA, and the plans submitted with it subject to the following condition:

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: PP-14433002v1 and A01.

  2. Section 03

    Main Issue

    The main issue is the effect on the character and appearance of the area.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    The proposal is to apply white render to all elevations of the dwelling. The works have been completed. The proposal therefore is retrospective.

    The property lies within a housing area that is made up of a series of cul-de-sacs which serve brick built, detached and semi-detached, houses and bungalows. The appeal property is a two storey detached dwelling. The rear faces the Green Lane public open space and play area. The dwelling and its neighbour have a forward facing gable which is not a common feature of this estate and these properties therefore represent a distinctive change in design from the uniform houses to the north; and those in the remainder of the estate, which generally have side facing gables. This dwelling is also set back when viewed from the north so has a reduced prominence within the street scene.

    The work to the property has been carried out to a high standard. The dwelling now has a more modern, contemporary appearance. As the dwelling already differs in form from most of the houses in this estate, the contrasting materials now reinforce this difference. Rather than detract from the appearance of the area, it adds some interest to the street scene and uplifts the appearance of the property. It is not prominent when travelling down the hill due to its set back. When approaching from Appeal Decision: 6006318 the south, it is more prominent but it is also viewed in combination with the white rendered property on Green Lane in the background. It has only a limited impact on the views from the area of open space to the rear.

    Overall, the introduction of the white render, particularly given the distinctive form of this property, represents a positive design intervention. As it contributes positively to the character of the area, it gains support from policy 29(a) of the County Durham Plan 2020. It does not conflict with the National Planning Policy Framework as it adds to the overall quality of the area.

    The Residential Amenity Standards Supplementary Planning Document 2023 advises that materials should normally be in keeping with those of the host property. It also accepts the use of contemporary materials providing they reflect and respect the characteristics of the host property and the surrounding streetscape. Whilst departing from these requirements, given that the overall purpose of the document is to promote high quality design, this conflict does not weigh significantly against the development plan policy support.

    [name] note the concerns expressed with regard to the timing of the works and potential changes to property values, these are not matters relevant to my considerations. I have also not had regard to the difficulties of returning the dwelling to its former condition as that would be a matter for the appellant.

    [name] have had regard to the matters raised by local residents and the council, I conclude that the proposal represents a high standard of design and gains support from the development plan. I therefore allow the appeal.

    As the works are complete and satisfactory in all respects, there is no requirement for conditions other than the approved plans condition.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 341No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    5 May 2026Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    22 April 2026 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
6006318
Application reference
DM/25/03030/FPA
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Durham County Council
Planning authority code
E06000047

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
Not recorded
Appeal reason
refused
Type detail
Householder
Jurisdiction
No Jurisdiction Associated
Link status
Not recorded

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
0 hectares
Floor space
90 m²
Number of residences
Not recorded
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
Not recorded
Affects setting of a listed building
Yes
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
11 March 2026
Valid date
20 March 2026
Start date
23 March 2026
Planning authority decision date
18 December 2025
Appeal decision date
5 May 2026

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
Not recorded
Bespoke
Not recorded
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
No
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Back Office
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
88297
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:29
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21