Appeal 6006405
Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.
A clearer next step
See how Inspectors approached issues like yours
Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.
- See which issues the decision appears to turn on
- Compare the facts and open the full appeal records
One private comparison
How the refusal review worksOne-off service · No subscription
Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.
Official decision document
The decision, section by section
9 sections
Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.
Section 01
Development description
a single storey rear extension; two storey side extension; single storey side extension.
Section 02
Decision
The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for a single storey rear extension; two storey side extension; single storey side extension and render to existing porch at [site address] , [name] [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref P25/1280, subject to the following
Section 03
conditions:
The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision.
The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with drawing nos O2/C, 03/B and 04A.
Section 04
Appeal Procedure, [name] and Main Issue
The site visit was undertaken by a representative of the Inspector whose recommendation is set out below and to which the Inspector has had regard before deciding the appeal The description in the banner is taken from the application form with proposed room details omitted for ease of reference. The decision notice also includes reference to rendering the existing porch. The evidence implies that this is acceptable. I have no reason to disagree and have included it. This change has not prejudiced the ability of any party to make their case in respect of the appeal scheme. The main issue in regard to which is its effect on the character and appearance of the area.
Section 05
Reasons for the Recommendation
The appeal building is a detached property in a residential area. It occupies a corner plot with gardens to the front, side and rear. The side elevation faces [address]. The rear boundary is bordered by fencing on the same side. The same can be said for the neighbouring property to the rear and together they create a tall, fenced boundary along the roadside. There are a variety of forms and designs that occupy corner plots with varying distances to boundaries and differing boundary treatments with no distinguishing building line.
The two-storey element would be in a similar position to the existing garage and would therefore be stepped in with the single storey part then being closest to the boundary. This would allow views across the site and reduce the obviousness of the two-storey aspect in the street scene. The proposals as a whole would have a subordinate appearance to the existing dwelling. Particularly the single storey element which would appear very similar to the existing garage situation. Reducing the sideways projection to single storey would also acceptably assimilate the impression of the resulting width of the extended dwelling.
There would be adequate space between the extended part and the roadside, and it would be in line with the existing stepped back frontage which would therefore retain a degree of spaciousness. Views of the extended parts would be clear when travelling along [address]. For the reasons set out, they would not be harmful. They would therefore comply with Policies ENV2 and ENV3 of the Black Country Core Strategy 2011 and Policies L1 and S6 of the Dudley Borough Development Strategy 2017 which are concerned with local character amongst other things.
Section 06
[name]
I have not been directed to the specific part of the Dudley Council Residential Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document 2023 that the Council has based their decision upon. The proposal may not strictly comply with all of its aspects; however, and for the reasons I have set out above, the overall design would relate well visually to the original house and would be subordinate in terms of scale which would be in accordance with the general thrust of the document’s aims.
Section 07
Conditions
Other than the standard time limit condition, it is necessary to ensure that the development is carried out in accordance with the approved plans for certainty and enforcement. These also show an acceptable external materials match. There is thus no need for a further condition thereon.
Section 08
Conclusion and Recommendation
For the reasons given above, the appeal scheme would comply with the development plan and there is nothing compelling to suggest a decision other than in accordance. I therefore recommend that the appeal should be allowed.
Section 09
Inspector’s Decision
I have considered all the submitted evidence and my representative’s report and on that basis the appeal is allowed. Planning permission is therefore granted, subject to the conditions set out above.
Planning inspector and document dates
The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.
Appeal Decision
- Extracted inspector · page 1
- Inspector attribution ID 1895No official casework-database value to compare
- Extracted decision date · page 1
- 1 May 2026Matches the official casework database
- Extracted site visit dates
- 21 April 2026 (page 1)
Reference and authority
Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.
- Case reference
- 6006405
- Application reference
- P25/1280
- Lead case reference
- Not recorded
- Planning authority
- Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council
- Planning authority code
- E08000027
Casework details
The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.
- Casework type
- Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development type
- Householder developments
- Appeal type reason
- Not recorded
- Appeal reason
- refused
- Type detail
- Householder
- Jurisdiction
- No Jurisdiction Associated
- Link status
- Not recorded
Site and development
Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.
- Site area
- 0 hectares
- Floor space
- 400 m²
- Number of residences
- Not recorded
- Site in Green Belt
- No
- Agricultural holding
- Not recorded
- Affects setting of a listed building
- Yes
- Historic building grant made
- Not recorded
- Relates to a conservation area
- Not recorded
- Flooding is an issue
- Not recorded
- Site within an AONB
- Not recorded
- Site within an SSSI
- Not recorded
Decision and dates
The published outcome and every imported case date.
- Official decision
- Allowed
- Decision category
- Allowed
- Received date
- 13 March 2026
- Valid date
- 13 March 2026
- Start date
- 17 March 2026
- Planning authority decision date
- 19 February 2026
- Appeal decision date
- 1 May 2026
Case administration
Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.
- Redetermined
- Not recorded
- Bespoke
- Not recorded
- Date recovered
- Not recorded
- Date not recovered or derecovered
- Not recorded
- Call-in date
- Not recorded
- Costs applied for
- No
- Enforcement grounds count
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds
- Not recorded
Source and catalogue history
When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.
- Source
- Planning Inspectorate casework database
- Source data system
- Back Office
- Dataset status
- Current release
- Catalogue record ID
- 88217
- First seen
- 20 August 2026 at 14:25
- Last seen
- 20 August 2026 at 16:29
- Removed from release
- Not recorded
- Record created
- 20 August 2026 at 14:25
- Record updated
- 24 August 2026 at 16:21