Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 6007581

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

6 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

the erection of a front roof extension to the house.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted the erection of a front roof extension to the house at [site address] , Hounslow [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, [name]/2026/0060, subject to the following conditions: - a) The development hereby permitted shall begin no later than 3 years from the date of this decision. b) The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: Location Plan and plans 001, 002, 003, 004 and 005. c) The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with those materials as specified upon the planning application form.

  2. Section 03

    Main Issue

    The main issue raised by this appeal is the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the surrounding area.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    The properties along this side of [address] are of a similar style and form. Many of those host roof dormers, some of similar appearance to that proposed. Close by the adjacent pair of semi-detached properties host front dormer roof extensions.

    The local planning authority highlights that those existing front roof extensions are historic and took place before the adoption of the most recent policy guidelines. Whilst not every property hosts front roof dormers, they are an established feature within this street scene and form part of the context and the character of the area. As such, the addition of a front dormer roof extension would not appear unsympathetic to the host dwelling or out of keeping given the prevalence of such roof features within this street scene. Furthermore, the street scene would not be substantially changed to such a degree that would harm its character and appearance as front roof dormers are a recurring feature within roof slopes.

    For these reasons, I conclude that the proposed development would not harm the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the surrounding area. As such, the proposed development would comply with Policies CC1, CC2 and SC7 of the London Borough of Hounslow Local Plan. These policies seek, amongst other matters, development to respect the context and character of the area and to maintain the character of the general street scene.

    The Hounslow Character, Sustainability and Design Codes Supplementary Planning Document Part A5 - [name] states that “dormer windows to the front of the property will generally be refused due to their impact on the character of the street scene”. Notwithstanding this guidance I have found that the front roof dormer would not harm the character of the street scene in this case.

  4. Section 05

    Conditions

    I have considered what conditions would be appropriate in light of paragraph 56 of the National Planning Policy Framework and the Planning Practice Guidance. In addition to the standard time limit condition and in the interests of certainty it is appropriate that there is a condition requiring the development to be carried out in accordance with the approved plans. In the visual interests of the locality the development should be undertaken in accordance with those materials as specified within the planning application form.

  5. Section 06

    Conclusion

    For the reasons set out above, and subject to the conditions listed, this appeal should be allowed.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 309No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    8 June 2026Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    26 May 2026 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
6007581
Application reference
P/2026/0060
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
London Borough of Hounslow
Planning authority code
E09000018

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
Not recorded
Appeal reason
refused
Type detail
Householder
Jurisdiction
No Jurisdiction Associated
Link status
Not recorded

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
0 hectares
Floor space
240 m²
Number of residences
Not recorded
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
Not recorded
Affects setting of a listed building
Yes
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
2 April 2026
Valid date
2 April 2026
Start date
17 April 2026
Planning authority decision date
16 March 2026
Appeal decision date
8 June 2026

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
Not recorded
Bespoke
Not recorded
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
No
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Back Office
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
90042
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:29
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21