Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 6007702

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

8 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

described as extensions and alterations to dwelling.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for extensions and alterations to dwelling at [site address] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref S26/0042 subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with drawing nos SB-06, SB-07, SB-08 and SB-09.

  2. Section 03

    Appeal Procedure

    The site visit was undertaken by a representative of the Inspector whose recommendation is set out below and to which the Inspector has had regard before deciding the appeal.

  3. Section 04

    Main Issue

    The main issue is the effect of the proposal upon the character and appearance of the area.

  4. Section 05

    Reasons for the Recommendation

    The appeal property is a large, detached dwelling situated amongst other residential properties. The design of the dwelling mirrors its neighbour, both of which are constructed in an L-shape design. Otherwise, there are a variety of housing designs and materials around the appeal site. Properties on the same side of the road as the dwelling are generally set back with front gardens. There are several examples of gables and dormers facing towards [site address] nearby.

    The proposal would make alterations to the front of the dwelling. The design of the extensions would echo the distinctive form of the existing property by retaining the L-shape and would use matching materials and detailing on gable frontages. The scheme includes an additional gable end on the front of the dwelling and although the exact design is not seen within the area, gable frontages are a common feature, and they would not therefore negatively draw the eye. The alterations are relatively minor when taking the size of the dwelling and appeal site into account and there would still be ample space to the front of the property. There is no doubt that some symmetry between the appeal property and the neighbouring dwelling would be lost. However, combining the reasons above with the location of the site amongst a diverse range of property types, the proposal would not cause harm to the character and appearance of the area.

    It would therefore comply with the requirements of Policy DE1 of the South Kesteven District Council Local Plan 2020 which is concerned with development making a positive contribution to local distinctiveness amongst other things.

  5. Section 06

    Conditions

    Other than the time limit condition, it is necessary to ensure that the development is carried out in accordance with the approved plans for certainty. The plans also show matching materials to the existing dwelling. Therefore, there is no need for a further condition.

  6. Section 07

    Conclusion and Recommendation

    For the reasons given above, the appeal scheme would comply with the development plan and there is nothing compelling to suggest a decision other than in accordance. I therefore recommend that the appeal should be allowed.

  7. Section 08

    Inspector’s Decision

    I have considered all the submitted evidence and my representative’s report and on that basis the appeal is allowed, and planning permission is granted subject to the conditions set out above.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 1895No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    12 June 2026Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    26 May 2026 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
6007702
Application reference
S26/0042
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
South Kesteven District Council
Planning authority code
E07000141

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
Not recorded
Appeal reason
refused
Type detail
Householder
Jurisdiction
No Jurisdiction Associated
Link status
Not recorded

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
0 hectares
Floor space
2,000 m²
Number of residences
Not recorded
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
Not recorded
Affects setting of a listed building
Yes
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
7 April 2026
Valid date
7 April 2026
Start date
16 April 2026
Planning authority decision date
4 March 2026
Appeal decision date
12 June 2026

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
Not recorded
Bespoke
Not recorded
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
No
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Back Office
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
90357
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:29
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:25
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21