Appeal 6008492
Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.
A clearer next step
See how Inspectors approached issues like yours
Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.
- See which issues the decision appears to turn on
- Compare the facts and open the full appeal records
One private comparison
How the refusal review worksOne-off service · No subscription
Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.
Official decision document
The decision, section by section
6 sections
Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.
Section 01
Development description
described in the application form as a “single storey side extension”.
Section 02
Decision
The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for a single storey side extension, at [site address] , in accordance with the terms of the application (reference 26/00024/FULHH), subject to the conditions set out in the attached Schedule of Conditions.
Section 03
Main issue
The main issue to be determined in this appeal is the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surroundings.
Section 04
Reasons
[site address] is an attractive coastal town in Essex. It has a long, developed sea coastline, from a golf course in the south to Walton-on-the-Naze in the north, although the built-up area is separated from the beach by a wide parkland strip. Thus set back from the coastline, residential areas are characterised by dwellings of various styles and sizes in a predominantly suburban setting.
The appeal site at number [site address] is located in a residential frontage, set away from the sea in the residential part of the town, where there is some variety in house types, although semi-detached pairs are typical. Some off-street parking spaces have been provided on front gardens but the locality is not over-developed.
Number 19 itself occupies a corner plot, with its side frontage on [address]. It is a two-storey semi-detached house, with number [address], of brickwork with a hipped roof in a traditional design. There is a parking space for two cars at the front of the house but the house also benefits from a front garden on the corner of the plot, which is relatively well screened by a fence and large shrubs (or small trees). As well as protecting the privacy of the householders, this also enhances the streetscene. Appeal Decision: 6008492
It is now proposed to add a single-storey extension to the side of the house, which would project forward of other buildings in [address], including the immediately neighbouring house.
The ‘National Planning Policy Framework’ emphasises the aim of “achieving well designed places” in the broadest sense (notably at Section 12), while making effective use of land and encouraging economic activity. It is aimed at achieving good design standards generally, by adding to the overall quality of the area and being visually attractive and sympathetic to local character and history, although it is also recognised that appropriate change may include increased densities. The achievement of good design includes protecting existing residential amenities and providing good standards of accommodation in new development.
Policies in the Development Plan also share these basic principles. In the ‘Tendring District Local Plan 2013-2033 and Beyond’, Section 1 is the “[name] Section” (adopted in January 2021), while Section 2 focusses on the area of Tendring, more specifically. Policy SP7 (in Section 1) is concerned with “[name]”, and Policy SPL 3 (in Section 2) promotes “[name]”. [name] seek to achieve high standards of urban and architectural design, responding to local character and context.
The ‘[name] is also relevant but it does not have the force of the statutory Development Plan.
The proposed extension would approximately align with the front elevation of the house in [address] (with a small offset), but it would project well forward of the “building line” in [address]. It would have an impact on the streetscene, in view of its location at the junction of the two roads. As a single-storey building, the visual impact would be limited, however, while the streetscene does offer some variety in any case, for example in the layout of the opposite corner. I am not persuaded that the introduction of a single-storey extension on this frontage would undermine the quality of the surroundings.
It is proposed that the extension should be finished with “[name]” cladding under a pitched slate roof (as shown on the submitted drawings). Thus, although the form of the extension would imitate the traditional form of the existing house (and others in the vicinity), its architectural image would be in contrast with the materials of the existing house. Contrasting materials have been used successfully nearby, however, including on the neighbouring house, and I take the view that variety in the townscape is not necessarily harmful.
In relation to the immediate neighbour at number [address], I note that the proposed new extension would be sited to the north of the neighbouring front garden and I accept that the extension would have only a limited impact on the outlook from that property, especially by comparison with the existing high boundary hedge.
In this case, therefore, I am convinced that the new extension would add interest to the townscape and that it would not harm the character or appearance of the surroundings.
Evidently, the appeal site lies within an established urban area, which is “sustainable” in planning terms, and the proposed extension would be a useful addition to the accommodation at [site address] . The contribution that the Appeal Decision: 6008492 appeal scheme would make to the provision of residential accommodation in the locality, even though it would be limited, weighs in favour of the appeal. I have concluded that the project would not be in conflict with national planning policies or with the Development Plan as a whole.
In short, I am persuaded that the scheme before me can properly be permitted, subject to conditions, and, although I have considered all the matters that have been raised in the representations, I have found nothing to cause me to alter my
Section 05
decision.
I have, however, also considered the need for conditions and I have concluded that conditions are necessary, to define the planning permission and to ensure that quality is maintained.
Section 06
SCHEDULE OF CONDITIONS
The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.
The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved drawings: drawing number 19/PBF (Existing Ground Floor Plan); drawing number 19/PBF/1 (Existing Ground Floor Plan); drawing number 19/PBF/2 (Proposed Ground Floor Plan); drawing number 19/PBF/3 (Existing and [name]); drawing number 19/PBF (Location Plan and Block Plan).
Planning inspector and document dates
The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.
Appeal Decision
- Extracted inspector · page 1
- Inspector attribution ID 285No official casework-database value to compare
- Extracted decision date · page 1
- 23 June 2026Matches the official casework database
- Extracted site visit dates
- 10 June 2026 (page 1)
Reference and authority
Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.
- Case reference
- 6008492
- Application reference
- 26/00024/FULHH
- Lead case reference
- Not recorded
- Planning authority
- Tendring District Council
- Planning authority code
- E07000076
Casework details
The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.
- Casework type
- Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development type
- Householder developments
- Appeal type reason
- Not recorded
- Appeal reason
- refused
- Type detail
- Householder
- Jurisdiction
- No Jurisdiction Associated
- Link status
- Not recorded
Site and development
Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.
- Site area
- 0 hectares
- Floor space
- 258 m²
- Number of residences
- Not recorded
- Site in Green Belt
- No
- Agricultural holding
- Not recorded
- Affects setting of a listed building
- Yes
- Historic building grant made
- Not recorded
- Relates to a conservation area
- Not recorded
- Flooding is an issue
- Not recorded
- Site within an AONB
- Not recorded
- Site within an SSSI
- Not recorded
Decision and dates
The published outcome and every imported case date.
- Official decision
- Allowed
- Decision category
- Allowed
- Received date
- 21 April 2026
- Valid date
- 21 April 2026
- Start date
- 20 May 2026
- Planning authority decision date
- 17 March 2026
- Appeal decision date
- 23 June 2026
Case administration
Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.
- Redetermined
- Not recorded
- Bespoke
- Not recorded
- Date recovered
- Not recorded
- Date not recovered or derecovered
- Not recorded
- Call-in date
- Not recorded
- Costs applied for
- No
- Enforcement grounds count
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds
- Not recorded
Source and catalogue history
When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.
- Source
- Planning Inspectorate casework database
- Source data system
- Back Office
- Dataset status
- Current release
- Catalogue record ID
- 90895
- First seen
- 20 August 2026 at 14:25
- Last seen
- 20 August 2026 at 16:29
- Removed from release
- Not recorded
- Record created
- 20 August 2026 at 14:25
- Record updated
- 24 August 2026 at 16:21