Appeal 6009636
Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.
A clearer next step
See how Inspectors approached issues like yours
Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.
- See which issues the decision appears to turn on
- Compare the facts and open the full appeal records
One private comparison
How the refusal review worksOne-off service · No subscription
Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.
Official decision document
The decision, section by section
5 sections
Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.
Section 01
Development description
for the conversion of garage into habitable room, first floor side extension over garage, two storey front side extension, enclosure of existing porch with new roof and extend driveway.
Section 02
Decision
The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for the conversion of garage into habitable room, first floor side extension over garage, two storey front/ side extension, enclosure of existing porch with new roof and extend driveway at [site address] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 26/0064/FFU, subject to the following conditions:
The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.
The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: P001, P003, P007, P008 and P009/A.
No demolition works shall take place until a Tree Protection Plan (TPP) specific to this scheme, has been submitted and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The Tree Protection Plan shall be written in accordance with, and address sections 5.5, 6.2, 6.3 and 7 of [name] 5837:2012 Trees in relation to design, demolition and construction recommendations. All protection measures shall be erected before any equipment, machinery or materials (including demolition and all preparatory work) are brought on to the site, and thereafter maintained until all construction work, equipment, machinery and surplus materials have been permanently removed from the site. once approved the development shall be undertaken in entire accordance with the approved plans and particulars. Nothing shall be stored or placed in any area in accordance with this condition and the ground levels within those protected areas shall not be altered, nor shall any excavation be made, without the prior written approval of the Local Planning Authority. Thereafter the works shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details until completion of the development.
Prior to first occupation of the development hereby permitted full details of all proposed tree planting shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. This will include planting and maintenance specifications, including cross-section drawings, use of guards or other protective measures and confirmation of location, species and sizes, nursery stock type, supplier, watering schedule and defect period. All tree planting shall be carried out in accordance with those details and at those times. Any trees that are found to be dead, dying, severely damaged or diseased within five years of the completion of the building works or five years following the completion of the landscaping scheme (whichever is later), shall be replaced in the following planting season (October to end of March) by specimens of similar size and species. This condition may only be fully discharged on completion of the planting subject to satisfactory written and photographic evidence, detailing that the trees have been planted as proposed.
Section 03
Main Issue
The main issue is the effect of the appeal proposal upon the character and appearance of the area.
Section 04
Reasons
The site comprises a detached dwelling in an established residential area at the junction of where [address] meets [name]. The site is the subject of a blanket Tree Preservation Order (Ref. TPO 1/76) served prior to the estate being built out.
The appeal site is currently largely screened from view from [name] when approaching from the south by mature, predominantly conifer and sycamore trees, and other domestic shrubs located along the back edge of the footway. This planting appears to have been established around the same time as the construction of the dwelling and whilst it does contribute to the verdant character of the area, it is not what I would consider to be high quality.
Notwithstanding this, the proposed first floor extension would be set over the existing garage area and some distance from the boundary such that it is unlikely that the scheme, with mitigation measures in place, would give rise to harm to the trees / vegetation.
The appeal dwelling, and therefore its flank elevation, is in an elevated position set a reasonable distance from the road; the two storey/first-floor side extension would be built within the location of the garage albeit situated further forward, and away from the aforementioned vegetation. The front elevation would consequently be closer to the principal elevation than the existing garage albeit with a slight set-back to it and a slight set-down from the ridge.
I acknowledge the Council’s concern about the overall scale of this extension, but the width of the extension, which is basically governed by the width of the existing garage would appear subordinate in form to it; and therefore consistent with the general spirit of the Council’s Residential Design Guide 2017. The spacious character of the surrounding area would be maintained and with the appeal site being in a relatively unique location such a proposal could not be easily replicated elsewhere, notwithstanding that each case should be assessed on its own merits.
Therefore, on balance I consider that the scheme would not result in an overly bulky design and it would be in keeping with the general street scene. I find that the proposal would not have a detrimental impact upon the character and appearance of the area and that the proposal complies with Policy DM9 of the [name] and Development Management Policies and Policy DH1 of the emerging Local Plan, in addition to Policy WNP2.1 of the Windlesham Neighbourhood Plan which together permit development where it respects and enhances local character, paying particular regard to, amongst other things, scale, massing and bulk, supporting extensions where they respond positively to and protect the built and natural character features of their setting.
Section 05
Conclusion and Conditions
For the reasons set out above and having regard to all other matters raised, I conclude that the appeal should succeed.
In addition to the standard time limit condition, I consider that it is appropriate to require the development to be carried out in accordance with the submitted plans, furthermore, I have imposed the two additional conditions suggested by the Council requiring tree protection details and additional planting, in the interests of protecting and enhancing the character and appearance of the area.
Planning inspector and document dates
The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.
Appeal Decision
- Extracted inspector · page 1
- Inspector attribution ID 297No official casework-database value to compare
- Extracted decision date · page 1
- 30 June 2026Matches the official casework database
- Extracted site visit dates
- 15 June 2026 (page 1)
Reference and authority
Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.
- Case reference
- 6009636
- Application reference
- 26/0064/FFU
- Lead case reference
- Not recorded
- Planning authority
- Surrey Heath Borough Council
- Planning authority code
- E07000214
Casework details
The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.
- Casework type
- Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development type
- Householder developments
- Appeal type reason
- Not recorded
- Appeal reason
- refused
- Type detail
- Householder
- Jurisdiction
- No Jurisdiction Associated
- Link status
- Not recorded
Site and development
Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.
- Site area
- 0 hectares
- Floor space
- 396 m²
- Number of residences
- Not recorded
- Site in Green Belt
- No
- Agricultural holding
- Not recorded
- Affects setting of a listed building
- Yes
- Historic building grant made
- Not recorded
- Relates to a conservation area
- Not recorded
- Flooding is an issue
- Not recorded
- Site within an AONB
- Not recorded
- Site within an SSSI
- Not recorded
Decision and dates
The published outcome and every imported case date.
- Official decision
- Allowed
- Decision category
- Allowed
- Received date
- 13 May 2026
- Valid date
- 13 May 2026
- Start date
- 21 May 2026
- Planning authority decision date
- 23 March 2026
- Appeal decision date
- 30 June 2026
Case administration
Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.
- Redetermined
- Not recorded
- Bespoke
- Not recorded
- Date recovered
- Not recorded
- Date not recovered or derecovered
- Not recorded
- Call-in date
- Not recorded
- Costs applied for
- No
- Enforcement grounds count
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds
- Not recorded
Source and catalogue history
When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.
- Source
- Planning Inspectorate casework database
- Source data system
- Back Office
- Dataset status
- Current release
- Catalogue record ID
- 91212
- First seen
- 20 August 2026 at 14:25
- Last seen
- 20 August 2026 at 16:29
- Removed from release
- Not recorded
- Record created
- 20 August 2026 at 14:25
- Record updated
- 24 August 2026 at 16:21