Skip to main content

Local planning authority

Mid Sussex District Council planning appeal evidence

Compare selected householder and planning-condition appeals across the latest five-year source window, then open a year or the underlying records.

National context: England’s planning policy and guidance

Five-year overview

Appeal evidence across the source window

The source covers 1 July 2021 to 30 June 2026. Each row compares allowed and dismissed householder or planning-condition appeals recorded in that calendar year. Other outcomes are shown separately.

Householder or condition appeals
79
Allowed
18
Dismissed
59
Bars showAllowedDismissedOther outcomes are listed in the counts.

The period total counts each appeal once when it is recorded as a householder appeal, one of the three planning-condition appeal types, or both. It is narrower than the total linked Planning Inspectorate casework used as the denominator in the evidence below.

Your planning decision

Have a refusal decision?

The planned private review will let you bring in the planning authority’s decision notice, identify the disputed points and compare source-located Inspector reasoning from relevant appeals.

See how the planned review works

Ordering is not open

Evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Planning Inspectorate casework

Householder and condition appeal evidence across five years

Across 1 July 2021 to 30 June 2026, this England-only rolling snapshot links 263 selected, decided Planning Inspectorate casework records to Mid Sussex District Council. Of these, 79 unique records appear in the householder or precise planning-condition evidence below.

The linked-casework count is the denominator used below, not a count of planning applications. The source can include specialist casework as well as appeals.

1 record appears in both views; the two headline counts should not be added together.

Official Householder (HAS) casework

Householder appeals

These are records whose official casework type is exactly Householder (HAS). That type can include different decision contexts, so use the underlying record to check what was disputed in each case. These outcomes do not predict what will happen in another appeal.

78

householder appeal records

29.7% of the 263 linked records with a decision date in the five-year source window.

Appeal allowed
17
Appeal dismissed
59
Other or unresolved
2

How to read householder decisions

Allowed means the Inspector allowed the appeal. Dismissed means the Inspector dismissed it. The label alone does not say whether the dispute was a refusal, an imposed condition or another matter; open the record for that context. The comparison rate uses these two clear outcomes only.

Open the records

Check the case facts and full outcome rather than relying on the rate alone.

Browse all 78 householder records →
  • Appeal 6007588

    Householder developments · decided 15 Jun 2026

    Appeal allowed
  • Appeal 6006354

    Householder developments · decided 30 Apr 2026

    Appeal dismissed
  • Appeal 6002980

    Householder developments · decided 29 Apr 2026

    Appeal allowed
  • Appeal 6002306

    Householder developments · decided 27 Apr 2026

    Appeal dismissed
  • Appeal 6003026

    Householder developments · decided 8 Apr 2026

    Appeal dismissed

My case concerns a planning condition

Appeals involving planning conditions

Condition cases follow different routes. The figures below keep imposed conditions, variation or removal, and required details separate so unlike cases are not blended together.

2

precise condition appeal records

  • Condition imposed on a permission

    The appeal concerns a condition attached when planning permission was granted.

    0

    No matching local records have a decision date in the five-year source window.

  • Variation or removal of a condition

    The appeal concerns an application to vary or remove an existing condition.

    Records
    2
    Allowed
    1
    Dismissed
    1
    Other
    0

    Local allowed rate: 50% (1 of 2 clear outcomes). England, same five-year window: 48.4% (955 of 1,974).

    Small local sample; no above-or-below direction is assigned.

    Browse these records →
  • Details required by a condition

    The appeal concerns approval of details required by an existing condition.

    0

    No matching local records have a decision date in the five-year source window.

Open the records

Check the case facts and full outcome rather than relying on the rate alone.

Browse all 2 condition records →
  • Appeal 3371598

    Householder developments · decided 8 Jan 2026

    Appeal allowed
  • Appeal 3330972

    Householder developments · decided 4 Apr 2024

    Appeal dismissed
Automated factual aggregation. Source: official Planning Inspectorate casework database, England only, selected decided snapshot. Counts use the authority code and reviewed directory aliases. England rates use the same release and exact five-year source-window scope, with the same allowed-or-dismissed denominator. Imported 20 August 2026.

Background council statistics

Wider council planning workload

Official MHCLG figures for Mid Sussex District Council, based on rolling 12-month returns ending 31 March 2026. This is general planning application context, separate from householder and condition appeals.

General planning applications

These figures describe the council’s general planning application workload. They do not measure householder or condition appeal outcomes.

Validated applications receivedYear ending 31 March 2026
1,160
7.2% lower than year ending 31 March 2025
Applications on handAt 1 January 2026
331
Point-in-time count
Planning decisions granting permissionYear ending 31 March 2026
91.7%
Share of planning decisions issued
Planning decisions made on timeYear ending 31 March 2026
96.9%
Within statutory or agreed time

Validated applications received over time

The line connects 5 complete rolling 12-month totals. Each point is labelled by its year ending.

Scroll the chart sideways to see every year.

Validated planning applications received by year endingLine plot with 5 complete rolling 12-month totals: year ending 31 March 2022, 1,829; year ending 31 March 2023, 1,560; year ending 31 March 2024, 1,244; year ending 31 March 2025, 1,250; year ending 31 March 2026, 1,160.Number of applications05001,0001,5002,0001,829Mar 20221,560Mar 20231,244Mar 20241,250Mar 20251,160Mar 2026Year ending
Number of validated applications received in each rolling 12-month period. The vertical scale starts at zero.
View the applications received data as a table
Validated planning applications received in complete rolling 12-month periods
Year endingValidated applications received
31 March 20221,829
31 March 20231,560
31 March 20241,244
31 March 20251,250
31 March 20261,160
More from the latest annual return
Applications withdrawn
66
Major decisions
57
Minor decisions
224
Other decisions
834

Compared with authorities of the same type, Mid Sussex District Council is in the upper quarter for application volume in the year ending 31 March 2026. The median among 164 authorities with complete returns was 718.

This compares raw volume, not population, staffing, complexity or service quality.

Source: MHCLG planning application statistics, published 19 June 2026 and checked 24 August 2026. Recent figures may include official imputations or revisions. Applications received exclude work such as pre-application advice, condition discharge, non-material amendments and tree work.

Open the official data · Read the methodology

Authority details

Official identity

Authority type
Non-metropolitan district
Region
South East
Official identifier
E07000228

Planning Data area point: Mid Sussex LPA (51.036144, −0.119197). This is the published representative point for the authority boundary, not a town hall, camera position or appeal site.

Official links

Directory record updated 21 August 2026.

Browse all authorities