Local planning authority
Hartlepool Borough Council planning appeal evidence
Compare selected householder and planning-condition appeals across the latest five-year source window, then open a year or the underlying records.
National context: England’s planning policy and guidance
Five-year overview
Appeal evidence across the source window
The source covers 1 July 2021 to 30 June 2026. Each row compares allowed and dismissed householder or planning-condition appeals recorded in that calendar year. Other outcomes are shown separately.
- Householder or condition appeals
- 14
- Allowed
- 2
- Dismissed
- 12
- 20212 appeals · 1 allowed · 1 dismissedView year
- 20224 appeals · 0 allowed · 4 dismissedView year
- 20231 appeal · 1 allowed · 0 dismissedView year
- 20245 appeals · 0 allowed · 5 dismissedView year
- 20251 appeal · 0 allowed · 1 dismissedView year
- 20261 appeal · 0 allowed · 1 dismissedView year
The period total counts each appeal once when it is recorded as a householder appeal, one of the three planning-condition appeal types, or both. It is narrower than the total linked Planning Inspectorate casework used as the denominator in the evidence below.
Your planning decision
Have a refusal decision?
The planned private review will let you bring in the planning authority’s decision notice, identify the disputed points and compare source-located Inspector reasoning from relevant appeals.
Ordering is not open
Evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.
Appeal research
Compare appeal reasoning by issue
These local views use Hartlepool Borough Council’s published cross-year evidence snapshot. They are research results, not a complete list of refusal reasons or an estimate of appeal prospects.
Planning Inspectorate casework
Householder and condition appeal evidence across five years
Across 1 July 2021 to 30 June 2026, this England-only rolling snapshot links 65 selected, decided Planning Inspectorate casework records to Hartlepool Borough Council. Of these, 14 unique records appear in the householder or precise planning-condition evidence below.
The linked-casework count is the denominator used below, not a count of planning applications. The source can include specialist casework as well as appeals.
Official Householder (HAS) casework
Householder appeals
These are records whose official casework type is exactly Householder (HAS). That type can include different decision contexts, so use the underlying record to check what was disputed in each case. These outcomes do not predict what will happen in another appeal.
13
householder appeal records
20% of the 65 linked records with a decision date in the five-year source window.
- Appeal allowed
- 1
- Appeal dismissed
- 12
- Other or unresolved
- 0
How to read householder decisions
Allowed means the Inspector allowed the appeal. Dismissed means the Inspector dismissed it. The label alone does not say whether the dispute was a refusal, an imposed condition or another matter; open the record for that context. The comparison rate uses these two clear outcomes only.
Open the records
Check the case facts and full outcome rather than relying on the rate alone.
- Appeal 6002479Appeal dismissed
Householder developments · decided 9 Mar 2026
- Appeal 3352563Appeal dismissed
Householder developments · decided 18 Mar 2025
- Appeal 3350443Appeal dismissed
Householder developments · decided 5 Nov 2024
- Appeal 3340860Appeal dismissed
Householder developments · decided 7 Jun 2024
- Appeal 3341915Appeal dismissed
Householder developments · decided 22 May 2024
My case concerns a planning condition
Appeals involving planning conditions
Condition cases follow different routes. The figures below keep imposed conditions, variation or removal, and required details separate so unlike cases are not blended together.
1
precise condition appeal record
Condition imposed on a permission
The appeal concerns a condition attached when planning permission was granted.
0
No matching local records have a decision date in the five-year source window.
Variation or removal of a condition
The appeal concerns an application to vary or remove an existing condition.
- Records
- 1
- Allowed
- 1
- Dismissed
- 0
- Other
- 0
Local allowed rate: 100% (1 of 1 clear outcomes). England, same five-year window: 48.4% (955 of 1,974).
Small local sample; no above-or-below direction is assigned.
Browse these records →Details required by a condition
The appeal concerns approval of details required by an existing condition.
0
No matching local records have a decision date in the five-year source window.
1 other condition-related record falls outside these three precise planning-appeal routes and is not included in the headline.
Open the records
Check the case facts and full outcome rather than relying on the rate alone.
- Appeal 3317885Appeal allowed
Minor retail and services · decided 21 Jul 2023
Background council statistics
Wider council planning workload
Official MHCLG figures for Hartlepool Borough Council, based on rolling 12-month returns ending 31 March 2026. This is general planning application context, separate from householder and condition appeals.
General planning applications
These figures describe the council’s general planning application workload. They do not measure householder or condition appeal outcomes.
- Validated applications receivedYear ending 31 March 2026
- 255
- 4.5% higher than year ending 31 March 2025
- Applications on handAt 1 January 2026
- 132
- Point-in-time count
- Planning decisions granting permissionYear ending 31 March 2026
- 93.3%
- Share of planning decisions issued
- Planning decisions made on timeYear ending 31 March 2026
- 99.6%
- Within statutory or agreed time
Validated applications received over time
The line connects 5 complete rolling 12-month totals. Each point is labelled by its year ending.
Scroll the chart sideways to see every year.
View the applications received data as a table
| Year ending | Validated applications received |
|---|---|
| 31 March 2022 | 403 |
| 31 March 2023 | 325 |
| 31 March 2024 | 257 |
| 31 March 2025 | 244 |
| 31 March 2026 | 255 |
More from the latest annual return
- Applications withdrawn
- 12
- Major decisions
- 20
- Minor decisions
- 54
- Other decisions
- 150
Compared with authorities of the same type, Hartlepool Borough Council is in the lower quarter for application volume in the year ending 31 March 2026. The median among 63 authorities with complete returns was 1,004.
This compares raw volume, not population, staffing, complexity or service quality.
County matters
Minerals and waste workload
These figures are reported separately from ordinary district planning applications and are not added to the district total.
- County-matter applications receivedYear ending 31 March 2026
- 0
- Year-on-year change not available
- Applications on handAt 1 January 2026
- 1
- Point-in-time count
- Planning decisions granting permissionYear ending 31 March 2026
- Not available
- Share of planning decisions issued
- Planning decisions made on timeYear ending 31 March 2026
- Not available
- Within statutory or agreed time
Validated applications received over time
The line connects 5 complete rolling 12-month totals. Each point is labelled by its year ending.
Scroll the chart sideways to see every year.
View the applications received data as a table
| Year ending | Validated applications received |
|---|---|
| 31 March 2022 | 2 |
| 31 March 2023 | 1 |
| 31 March 2024 | 0 |
| 31 March 2025 | 0 |
| 31 March 2026 | 0 |
More from the latest annual return
- Applications withdrawn
- 0
- Minerals decisions
- Not available
- Waste decisions
- Not available
Compared with authorities of the same type, Hartlepool Borough Council is in the lower quarter for application volume in the year ending 31 March 2026. The median among 62 authorities with complete returns was 0.
This compares raw volume, not population, staffing, complexity or service quality.
Authority details
Official identity
- Authority type
- Unitary authority
- Region
- North East
- Official identifier
- E06000001
Planning Data area point: Hartlepool LPA (54.669032, −1.25567). This is the published representative point for the authority boundary, not a town hall, camera position or appeal site.